Print Page | Close Window

JOHAN DU TOIT CITED

Printed From: Lionsworld
Category: Rugby Competitions
Forum Name: Super Rugby
Forum Description: Super Rugby
URL: http://www.lionsworld.co.za/forumnew/forum_posts.asp?TID=8769
Printed Date: 19-Apr-2024 at 7:58pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: JOHAN DU TOIT CITED
Posted By: Transvaal
Subject: JOHAN DU TOIT CITED
Date Posted: 16-Mar-2020 at 8:31am
Player: Johan du Toit
Team: Stormers
Position: Flanker
Date of Incident: 14 March 2020
Nature of Offence: Law 9.17 A player must not tackle, charge, pull, push or grasp an opponent whose feet are off the ground.
Elapsed time in match when incident occurred: 00:10

Johan du Toit of the Stormers has been cited for alleged foul play during a Super Rugby match at the weekend.

du Toit is alleged to have contravened Law 9.17 during the match between the Sharks and Stormers at Jonnson Kings Park in Durban on 14 March 2020.

Upon further review of the match footage, the Citing Commissioner deemed in his opinion the incident had met the Red Card threshold for foul play.

The Case is to be considered in the first instance by the SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee which will take place on Monday 16 March 2020, 9am(SAST), 6pm(AEDT), 8pm(NZDT) via video-conference.

All SANZAAR disciplinary matters are in the first instance referred to the Foul Play Review Committee to provide the option of expediting the judicial process.

For a matter to be dispensed with at this hearing, the person appearing must plead guilty and accept the penalty offered by the Foul Play Review Committee.



Replies:
Posted By: WitBoer
Date Posted: 16-Mar-2020 at 9:15am
Ek wonder, in so geval waar die skeidsregter die TV skeidsregter se aanbeveling verwerp en die citing commissioner dan wel bepaal dat dit rooi moes moes, is daar enige nagevolge vir die skeidsregter of kom hulle skotvry daarvan af? 
Dit is regtig belaglik, Seconds het dadelik vir AJ vertal dat Louis darem net op sy rug geval het en dit et 'n geel moet wees....
Hoekom word Seconds hoegenaamd toegelaat om in enige hoedangheid behalwe as ondersteuner, betrokke te wees by 'n Stormers wedstryd.



-------------
"Believe nothing, No matter where you read it, Or who has said it, Not even if I have said it, Unless it agrees with your own reason And your own common sense" - Buddha


Posted By: valie
Date Posted: 16-Mar-2020 at 10:41am
Originally posted by WitBoer WitBoer wrote:

Ek wonder, in so geval waar die skeidsregter die TV skeidsregter se aanbeveling verwerp en die citing commissioner dan wel bepaal dat dit rooi moes moes, is daar enige nagevolge vir die skeidsregter of kom hulle skotvry daarvan af? 
Dit is regtig belaglik, Seconds het dadelik vir AJ vertal dat Louis darem net op sy rug geval het en dit et 'n geel moet wees....
Hoekom word Seconds hoegenaamd toegelaat om in enige hoedangheid behalwe as ondersteuner, betrokke te wees by 'n Stormers wedstryd.

Ek sal ook like om te weet.....


Posted By: Leeubok
Date Posted: 16-Mar-2020 at 11:50am
Het ook daai voorval gesien en dit was shocking!


Posted By: TunaLion
Date Posted: 16-Mar-2020 at 12:54pm
Dit was n definitiewe rooi kaart en ek verstaan nie hoe dit enigsins n mitigating faktor is dat hy op sy rug geland het (al het sy kop ook kontak gemaak met die grond). Deur op jou rug te land, kan jy nogsteeds verlam word, ens ens. Hoe die hel is dit enigsins n mitigating faktor?!?!

Hel, selfs Dobson het na die game gesĂȘ hy sou nie kon stry as dit n rooikaart was nie... Shocking van die ref en van Seconds!


-------------
Go LIONS!!!!!


Posted By: Lion4ever
Date Posted: 17-Mar-2020 at 11:10am
Originally posted by valie valie wrote:

Originally posted by WitBoer WitBoer wrote:

Ek wonder, in so geval waar die skeidsregter die TV skeidsregter se aanbeveling verwerp en die citing commissioner dan wel bepaal dat dit rooi moes moes, is daar enige nagevolge vir die skeidsregter of kom hulle skotvry daarvan af? 
Dit is regtig belaglik, Seconds het dadelik vir AJ vertal dat Louis darem net op sy rug geval het en dit et 'n geel moet wees....
Hoekom word Seconds hoegenaamd toegelaat om in enige hoedangheid behalwe as ondersteuner, betrokke te wees by 'n Stormers wedstryd.

Ek sal ook like om te weet.....
As much as I don't like Seconds, all he was doing was relaying what the TMO said, and was following the lead as to what AJ was saying.


Posted By: WitBoer
Date Posted: 17-Mar-2020 at 1:07pm
Originally posted by Lion4ever Lion4ever wrote:

Originally posted by valie valie wrote:

Originally posted by WitBoer WitBoer wrote:

Ek wonder, in so geval waar die skeidsregter die TV skeidsregter se aanbeveling verwerp en die citing commissioner dan wel bepaal dat dit rooi moes moes, is daar enige nagevolge vir die skeidsregter of kom hulle skotvry daarvan af? 
Dit is regtig belaglik, Seconds het dadelik vir AJ vertal dat Louis darem net op sy rug geval het en dit et 'n geel moet wees....
Hoekom word Seconds hoegenaamd toegelaat om in enige hoedangheid behalwe as ondersteuner, betrokke te wees by 'n Stormers wedstryd.

Ek sal ook like om te weet.....
As much as I don't like Seconds, all he was doing was relaying what the TMO said, and was following the lead as to what AJ was saying.
Nope, before he was relaying, when AJ initially referred the matter to the TV ref, he already started pleading the Stormers case with AJ, claiming mitigation.


-------------
"Believe nothing, No matter where you read it, Or who has said it, Not even if I have said it, Unless it agrees with your own reason And your own common sense" - Buddha



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net